Most AI visibility audits are one screenshot and a hope.
The complete system for measuring whether AI engines actually cite a website — framework, tracker, walkthrough, and white-label client templates. Built and tested in a live public lab, not theorized. No coding. The whole tool stack costs $0.
of ChatGPT's cited links overlap when you ask it the exact same question twice. Which means a single run is a coin flip — and most audits being sold right now are one run, screenshotted. This kit is the method that survives a client re-running your prompt and getting something different.
The order to open things in, and what your first afternoon looks like.
17 slides, one idea each. Ten minutes and the whole method makes sense before you open anything else.
All six audit dimensions in plain English — click-by-click steps, scoring rubrics, and the traps.
Where the audit lives. Prompt inventory, run log, and dashboards — including ChatGPT replicate scoring and cluster coverage, calculated for you.
The page that answers your client's hardest questions before they ask. White-labeled to your brand.
Your report, pre-structured. Fill the blanks, delete the instructions, deliver.
Never a single run. Every prompt scored as a rate — "cited in 2 of 3." When a client re-runs your prompt and sees something different, that's the variance you already measured.
Google doesn't show an AI Overview on every search. That's "no AIO," not a miss. Fake zeros hand your client a scarier number than the truth.
Named without a link is a signal. Linked is the win. Separate columns, forever — the moment you blend them your numbers stop meaning anything.
Signed out, cookies cleared, never clicking through to the site you're auditing. Anyone can re-check your work and get the same kind of result.
Do AI engines recommend this site right now — and who wins instead?
Can an AI crawler actually read the site, or does it hit an empty room?
Can an AI agent actually use the site — fill the form, request the quote?
Is the content structured so an engine can lift a clean answer from it?
Do the engines recognize this brand as a real, specific thing?
Are the boring fundamentals everything else stands on actually in place?
What this is not: a citation guarantee. The kit teaches you to measure visibility and legibility — where a site stands and what's blocking it. Whether engines then cite it is a content, authority, and entity game that plays out over months. Anyone promising AI citations is selling something they don't control. Measuring honestly is the part you can control, and it's what makes everything else you say believable.
No. The lab setup takes about 15 minutes and costs nothing — a separate browser profile and free accounts. Everything else is a browser and the tracker workbook.
Your first one takes an afternoon. By the third, roughly two hours.
Yes — that's the point. Two of the six files are white-label templates meant to go out under your own brand.
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, and Claude.
The engines change; the measurement discipline doesn't. Updates to this edition are free — when engine behavior shifts enough to matter, you get the revision.
30-day money-back, no questions asked.